Compliance Landscape

Aggregate landscape intelligence for regulators and policymakers — who is in scope and when, so the market can be helped to comply. This is a structural map of obligations and deadlines, not a register of accusations.

Aggregate & name-free by design. No company is named on this view. Figures are scope and deadline facts across a jurisdiction — never a finding that any organisation is non-compliant. The goal is help-first outreach, not enforcement.
Entities tracked
142
All covered jurisdictions
Frameworks in scope
21
distinct binding frameworks bind this cohort
Nearest deadline
95 days
Colorado AI Act (SB24-205)
1 Jan 2027
In scope by framework
GDPR / UK GDPR
39
EU AI Act
30
DORA
30
NIS2
30
CRA
30
HIPAA
27
Colorado AI Act (SB24-205)
27
California Bot Disclosure (SB 1001)
27
California GenAI Training-Data Transparency (AB 2013)
27
California AI Transparency Act (SB 942)
27
Illinois Biometric Privacy (BIPA)
27
Illinois AI in Employment (HB 3773)
27
NYC Automated Employment Tools (Local Law 144)
27
Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA)
27
Utah AI Policy Act (SB 149)
27
China GenAI & Algorithm Rules
19
Korea AI Basic Act
7
India IT Rules — Synthetic Content
5
Quebec Law 25 — Automated Decisions
3
Taiwan AI Basic Act
1
Vietnam Law on AI
1
Compliance-pressure distribution
140 entities

Pressure = deadline proximity × scope confidence — a prioritisation signal for who needs help soonest, not a compliance score or breach probability. Bars are anonymous entity counts.

38
Low0-20
0
Modest21-40
35
Moderate41-60
29
Elevated61-80
38
Urgent81-100

Aggregate figures derived from the CSOAI intel graph. No organisation is identified on this page. For help-first, jurisdiction-level engagement, contact the CSOAI regulatory programme. Not legal advice.